ISSN 0137-0944
eISSN 2949-6144
En Ru
ISSN 0137-0944
eISSN 2949-6144
Diurnal dynamics of CO2 emission from soils of typical biogeocenoses in the north of Western Siberia

Diurnal dynamics of CO2 emission from soils of typical biogeocenoses in the north of Western Siberia

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of modern, high-precision methods for assessing ecosystem carbon budgets, most primary data for calculating monthly, seasonal, and annual gas fluxes are obtained through daily soil or ecosystem respiration measurements. The question remains whether such one-time, albeit regular, measurements can reliably reflect the average daily flux. The objectives of this study included assessing patterns in the diurnal dynamics of soil CO2 emissions for two northern taiga ecosystems (green moss pine forests and frozen hummocky peatlands) and three spotted-medallion tundra ecosystems (mineral spot, overgrown area, and dwarf birch area) in northern Western Siberia. In August2016 and 2017, CO2 emissions from the soil surface were measured every four hours for two days using a chamber method, as well as soil temperature and volumetric moisture at a depth of 10 cm. Significant diurnal dynamics were observed for all studied ecosystems, despite different absolute values of CO2 emissions. Minimum fluxes were observed in the pre-dawn hours, around 2:00 AM, for all sites. Maximum fluxes were recorded at various times but generally occurred between 2:00 PM and 6:00 PM. For most sites, the diurnal variation in emission values correlated with soil temperature, but a pronounced hysteresis was observed in this relationship. This phenomenon is explained by both biological factors—root respiration dynamics depend more on photosynthesis than on soil temperature—and physical factors—impeded gas diffusion in dense mineral horizons. The most favorable hours for measuring CO2 emissions, in terms of subsequent calculations of diurnal fluxes for most of the studied ecosystemsduring peak vegetation, are morning (before 10:00 AM) and evening (from 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM).

References

1.    Алейников А.А., Алейникова А.М., Бочарников М.В. и др. Остров Вайгач: природа, климат и человек. Всемирный фонд дикой природы (WWF). М., 2014. 542 с.
2.    Гончарова О.Ю., Матышак Г.В., Бобрик А.А. и др. Оценка вклада корневого и микробного дыхания в общий поток СО2 из торфяных почв и подзолов севера Западной Сибири методом интеграции компонентов // Почвоведение. 2019. № 2. С. 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032180X19020059
3.    Гончарова О.Ю., Матышак Г.В., Тимофеева М.В. и др. Эмиссия СО2 почвами экотонной зоны севера Западной Сибири // Почвоведение. 2023. № 9. С. 1034–1048.
4.    Дроздов Д.С., УкраинцеваН.Г., Царев А.М. и др. Изменения температурного поля мерзлых пород и состояния геосистем на территории Уренгойского месторождения за последние 35 лет (1974–2008) // Криосфера Земли. 2010. Т. XIV, № 1. С. 22–31.
5.    Кудеяров В.Н. Почвенное дыхание и секвестрация углерода (обзор) // Почвоведение. 2023. № 9. С. 1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X23990017
6.    Малышева Н.В., Моисеев Б.Н., Филипчук А.Н. и др. Методы оценки баланса углерода в лесных экосистемах и возможности их использования для расчетов годичного депонирования углерода // Лесной вестник. 2017. Т. 21, № 1. С. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2017-1-4-13
7.    Матышак Г.В., Богатырев Л.Г., Гончарова О.Ю. и др. Особенности развития почв гидроморфных экосистем северной тайги Западной Сибири в условиях криогенеза // Почвоведение. 2017. № 10. С. 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X17100069
8.    Махныкина А.В., Прокушкин А.С., Ваганов Е.А. и др. Динамика потоков СО2 с поверхности почвы в сосновых древостоях Средней Сибири // Журн. Сибирского федерального ун-та. Биология. 2016. № 3. С. 338–357.
9.    Оценка потоков парниковых газов в экосистемах регионов Российской Федерации / Под ред. член-корр. РАН А.А. Романовской. М., 2023. 346 с.
10.    Сорокина Д.Д., Птичников А.В., Романовская А.А. Сравнительный анализ и оценка методик расчета поглощения парниковых газов лесными экосистемами, применяемых в Российской Федерации // Известия РАН. Сер. географическая. 2023. Т. 87, № 4. С. 497–511. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556623040131
11.    УкраинцеваН.Г., Дроздов Д.С., Попов К.А. и др. Ландшафтная индикация локальной изменчивости свойств многолетнемерзлых пород (Уренгойское месторождение, Западная Сибирь) // Криосфера Земли. 2011. Т. XV, № 4. С. 37–40.
12.    Barron-Gafford G.A., Scott R.L., Jenerette G.D. et al. The relative controls of temperature, soil moisture, and plant functional group on soil CO2 efflux at diel, seasonal, and annual scales // Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2011. № 116. G01023.
13.    Darenova E., Pavelka M., Acosta M. Diurnal deviations in the relationship between CO2 efflux and temperature: a case study // Catena. 2014. № 123. P. 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.08.008
14.    Fouché J., Keller C., Allard M. et al. Diurnal evolution of the temperature sensitivity of CO2 efflux in permafrost soils under control and warm conditions // Sci. Total Environ. 2017. Vol. 581–582. P. 161–173.
15.    Gagnon S., Allard M., Nicosia A. Diurnal and seasonal variations of tundra CO2 emissions in a polygonal peatland near Salluit, Nunavik // Canada. Arctic Science. 2017. № 4. P. 1–15.
16.    Jian J., Steele M.K., Day S.D. et al. Measurement strategies to account for soil respiration temporal heterogeneity across diverse regions // Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018. Vol. 125. P. 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.07.003
17.    Kučinskas O., Marozas V. Diurnal and seasonal soil CO2 efflux variation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in the European hemi-boreal zone, Lithuania // J. Elem. 2021. Vol. 26, № 3. P. 731–754. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2021.26.1.2124
18.    Kuzyakov Y., Gavrichkova O. Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: A review of mechanisms and controls // Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010. № 16. P. 3386–3406.
19.    Liu Q., Edwards N.T., Post W.M. et al. Temperature-independent diel variation in soil respiration observed from a temperate deciduous forest // Global Change Biology. 2006. № 12. Р. 2136–2145.
20.    Makita N., Kosugi Y., Sakabe A. et al. Seasonal anddiurnal patterns of soil respiration in an evergreen coniferousforest: Evidence from six years of observation with automaticchambers // PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13, № 2. e0192622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0 192622

21.    Subke J.-A., Reichstein M., Tenhunen M. Explaining temporal variation in soil CO2 efflux in a mature spruce forest in Southern Germany // Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2003. № 35. P. 1467–1483.
22.    Tang J., Baldocchi D.D., Xu L. Tree photosynthesis modulates soil respiration on a diurnal time scale // Global Change Biol. 2005. Vol. 11, № 8. P. 1298–1304.
23.    Zimmermann M., Meir P., Bird M. et al. Litter contribution to diurnal and annual soil respiration in a tropical montane cloud forest // Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2009. Vol. 41, № 6. P. 1338–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.023
PDF, ru

Received: 11/07/2025

Accepted: 01/29/2026

Accepted date: 05/19/2026

Keywords: soil respiration; greenhouse gases; wetland ecosystems; forest ecosystems; spotted-medallion tundra

DOI: 10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2026-81-2-211-220

Available in the on-line version with: 18.05.2026

  • To cite this article:
Issue 2, 2026