Thermal properties of the urban soil upper horizon under application of different doses of biochar

Abstract

Thermal properties of the upper arable horizon of urban soil sampled on the territory of the Experimental soil station of Moscow State University, birch biochar, and their mixtures were studied. Soil from the Ap horizon was sieved through a 1 mm sieve and then mixed with biochar in various proportions; the biochar content in the mixtures ranged from 1 to 15% by dry weight. Plastic cylinders 5.1 cm high and 7.7 cm in diameter were filled with soil, biochar, and their mixtures. The bulk density of the samples varied from 1.34 g·cm–3 for the Ap horizon to 0.28 g·cm–3 for biochar. Thermal properties were measured with a probe method using a TEMPOS device with an SH-3 probe; the distance between the probe needles was 0,6 cm. A series of measurements were performed for each of the six samples with a stepwise change in sample moisture content from the maximum one after capillary saturation to the minimum one in an air-dry state. At each moisture content for each sample, the thermal properties were measured in tenfold repetition, successively placing the probe in different positions within the central zone of the sample. The heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thermal diffusivity of the substrates consistently decreased with increasing biochar content over the entire moisture content range; the highest values of all thermal properties were obtained for the Ap horizon, and the lowest for biochar. All samples demonstrated a linear growth of volumetric heat capacity with moisture content, and the slopes of the obtained curves were quite similar. The specific heat capacity of soil moisture calculated from the experimental data was equal to 3406.8 J·kg–1·K–1, which confirms the concept that the heat capacity of water in the soil is less than the heat capacity of free water. The thermal conductivity of biochar increased almost linearly with moisture content. The thermal conductivity of soil and mixtures increased rapidly with moisture content in the range of 0.03–0.20 cm3·cm–3, then the growth slowed down, and with an increase in moisture above 0.45 cm3·cm–3, the thermal conductivity decreased. The thermal diffusivity of biochar was very low and almost constant over the entire moisture range. The thermal diffusivity vs. moisture content dependences for soil and mixtures were similar to the curves for thermal conductivity, but had two weakly expressed maxima, the first of which was observed at moisture content below 0.20 cm3·cm–3. It is concluded that the introduction of biochar into loamy soil reduces its thermal diffusivity and thereby stabilizes the soil temperature regime, reducing the range of diurnal temperature fluctuations and slowing down seasonal warming. For urban conditions with high summer temperatures, this effect can be regarded as positive; for regions with low heat supply, the introduction of biochar into the soil is rather undesirable, at least in the context of soil temperature regime.

References

1.    Андрианов П.И. Теплоемкость связанной воды и теплоемкость почв // Доклады ВАСХНИЛ. 1936. Вып. 2. С. 71–74.
2.    Архангельская Т.А. Температуропроводность серых лесных почв Владимирского ополья // Почвоведение. 2004. № 3. С. 332–342.
3.    Архангельская Т.А., Телятникова Е.В., Умарова А.Б. Температуропроводность почвенно-торфяных смесей: нелинейная зависимость от содержания торфа // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 17. Почвоведение. 2024. Т. 79, № 4. С. 105–113. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2024-79-4-105-113
4.    Вершинин П.В., Мельникова М.К., Мичурин Б.Н. и др. Основы агрофизики. М., 1959. 903 с.
5.    Григорьян Б.Р., Грачев А.Н., Кулагина В.И. и др. Влияние биоугля на рост растений, микробиологические и физико-химические показатели мало гумусированной почвы в условиях вегетационного опыта // Вестн. технологического ун-та. 2016. Т. 19, № 11. С. 185–С. 189.
6.    Дмитриев Е.А. К вопросу о некоторых факторах, определяющих удельную теплоемкость твердой фазы почвы // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. биол. 1958. № 4. С. 103–111.
7.    Когут Б.М., Большаков В.А., Фрид А.С. и др. Аналитическое обеспечение мониторинга гумусового состояния почв. М., 1993. 73 с.
8.    Минникова Т.В., Русева А.С., Колесников С.И. и др. Численность бактерий в нефтезагрязненном черноземе обыкновенном после ремедиации // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 17. Почвоведение. 2023. Т. 78, № 3. С. 65–75. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2023-78-3-65-75
9.    Прибор для определения теплофизических параметров материалов TEMPOS. СПб., 2019. 38 с.
10.    Рижия Е.Я., Бойцова Л.В., Вертебный В.Е. и др. Изменчивость полифенолоксидазной и пероксидазной активности агродерново-подзолистой почвы разной окультуренности с биоуглем // Сельскохозяйственная биология. 2022. Т. 57, № 3. С. 476–485.
11.    Chen H., Ma J., Wei J. et al. Biochar increases plant growth and alters microbial communities via regulating the moisture and temperature of green roof substrates // Sci. Total Environ. 2018. Vol. 635. P. 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.127
12.    Chowdhury S., Akpinar D., Nakhli S.A.A. et al. Improving stormwater infiltration and retention in compacted urban soils at impervious/pervious surface disconnections with biochar // J. Environ. Man. 2024. Vol. 360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121032
13.    De Vries D.A. Thermal properties of soils / In: D.A. De Vries, W.R. Van Wijk (Eds.), Physics of plant environment Amsterdam, 1963. P. 210–235.
14.    Kayes I., Halim M.A., Thomas S.C. Biochar mitigates methane emissions from organic mulching in urban soils: Evidence from a long-term mesocosm experiment // J. Environ. Man. 2025. Vol. 376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124525
15.    Kayiranga A., Li Z., Isabwe A. et al. The effects of heavy metal pollution on collembola in urban soils and associated recovery using biochar remediation: a review // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023. Vol. 20, № 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043077
16.    Kim Y.J., Hyun J., Yoo S.Y., Yoo G. The role of biochar in alleviating soil drought stress in urban roadside greenery // Geoderma. 2021. Vol. 404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115223
17.    Kong S., Tang J., Ouyang F., Chen M. Research on the treatment of heavy metal pollution in urban soil based on biochar technology // Environ. Technol. Innovation. 2021. Vol. 23. P. 101670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101670
18.    Minnikova T.V., Kolesnikov S.I., Ruseva A.S. et al. Influence of the biochar on petroleum hydrocarbon degradation intensity and ecological condition of haplic chernozem // Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 2022. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 157–166. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1037798
19.    Obia A., Cornelissen G., Martinsen V. et al. Conservation tillage and biochar improve soil water content and moderate soil temperature in a tropical Acrisol // Soil Till. Res. 2020. Vol. 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104521
20.    Scharenbroch B.C., Meza E.N., Catania M. et al. Biochar and biosolids increase tree growth and improve soil quality for urban landscapes // J. Environ. Qual. 2013. Vol. 42, № 5. P. 1372–1385.
21.    Somerville P.D., Farrell C., May P.B. et al. Biochar and compost equally improve urban soil physical and biological properties and tree growth, with no added benefit in combination // Sci. Total Environ. 2020. Vol. 706. P. 135736.
22.    Usowicz B., Lipiec J., Łukowski M. et al. Impact of biochar addition on soil thermal properties: Modelling approach // Geoderma. 2020. Vol. 376. P. 114574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114574
23.    Usowicz B., Lipiec J., Łukowski M. et al. The effect of biochar application on thermal properties and albedo of loess soil under grassland and fallow // Soil Till. Res. 2016. Vol. 164. P. 45–51.
24.    Yoo S.Y., Kim Y.J., Yoo G. Understanding the role of biochar in mitigating soil water stress in simulated urban roadside soil // Sci. Total Environ. 2020. Vol. 738. P. 139798.
25.    Yue Y., Cui L., Lin Q. et al. Efficiency of sewage sludge biochar in improving urban soil properties and promoting grass growth // Chemosphere. 2017. Vol. 173. P. 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.096