The relationship between the mechanisms of formation of erosion resistance and soil water stability

Abstract

Kuznetsov’s formula relates the parameters of erosion resistance and soil water stability. However, the mechanism of occurrence of these properties is different: water stability is explained by the action of intra–aggregate hydrophobic bonds in organomineral soil gels, and erosion resistance is explained by water stable aggregates and their adhesion to each other. At the same time, the nature of the interaggregate bonds that ensure erosion resistance remains unclear. The purpose of the work was to clarify the mechanism of erosion resistance of soils and compare it with the mecha- nism of formation of water stability. The work used samples of humus-accumulative soil horizons: sod-podzolic and leached chernozem. To obtain samples with the same aggregate composition, but differing in erosion resistance, it is proposed to use soil polymer ameliorants (SPM). The erosion resistance of soils was determined on a hydrolotter and the critical rate of flushing was calculated. The water stability of the soils was assessed by the blade method. The particle size in the solutions was estimated by laser diffractometry. It was found that on soils treated with SPM, the results of the tray and blade methods correlate by 99%. The high correlation suggests a common nature of intra- and interaggregate bonds. To test the role of hydrophobic interactions in the formation of aggregates resistant to water, polymers of varying degrees of hydrophobicity were added to aqueous humate solutions in a model experiment: polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyacrylamide (PAA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). In parallel, the water stability of soils treated with PEG, PAA and PVA was evaluated. The analysis of the results showed that the greatest water stability of the aggregates was noted when the most hydrophobic polymer, polyvinyl alcohol, was added to the soil, which formed the largest particles when interacting with humate in the model experiment. These results confirm the role of hydrophobic interactions in the formation of aggregates and indicate that when selecting polymer structures, their interaction should be taken into account not with clay minerals, but with soil gels, which include clay minerals and humic substances.

References

1.    Бабаев М.П., Гурбанов Э.А. Противоэрозионная стойкость орошаемых почв Азербайджанской Республики // Почвоведение. 2010. № 12.
2.    Глушко А.Я., Фролко Д.С. Особенности управления эрозированными земельными ресурсами Юга России // Terra economicus. 2012. Т. 10, № 3–2.
3.    Кузин Е.Н., Арефьев А.Н., Кузина Е.Е. Изменение плодородия почв. Пенза, 2013.
4.    Кузнецов М.С., Глазунов Г.П. Эрозия и охрана почв: Учебник для вузов, 3-изд., испр. и доп. М., 2019.
5.    Кульман А. Искусственные структурообразователи почвы. М., 1982.
6.    Потапов Д.И. Влияние влажности на гидрофильно-гидрофобные свойства почв различных типов // Экологический вестник Северного Кавказа. 2022. Т. 18, № 1.
7.    Ревут И.Б., Масленкова Г.Л., Романов И.А. Химические способы воздействия на испарение и эрозию почвы. Л., 1973.
8.    Тюлин А.Ф. Органо-минеральные коллоиды в почве, их генезис и значение для корневого питания высших растений. М., 1958.
9.    Ушкова Д.А., Конкина У.А., Горепекин И.В. и др. Устойчивость агрегатов пахотных почв: экспериментальное определение и нормативная характеристика // Почвоведение. 2023. № 2.
10.    Федотов Г.Н., Шеин Е.В., Ушкова Д.А. и др. Надмолекулярные образования из молекул гуминовых веществ и их фрактальная организация // Почвоведение. 2023а. № 8.
11.    Федотов Г.Н., Шоба С.А., Ушкова Д.А. и др. Природа связей в формировании водоустойчивости почвенных агрегатов // Доклады РАН. Науки о земле. 2023б. Т. 513, № 2.
12.    Холодов В.А. Способность почвенных частиц самопроизвольно образовывать макроагрегаты после цикла увлажнения и высушивания // Почвоведение. 2013. № 6.
13.    Шеин Е.В., Милановский Е.Ю. Органическое вещество и структура почвы: учение В.Р. Вильямса и современность // Известия ТСХА. 2014. № 1.
14.    Angelico R., Colombo C., Di Iorio E. et al. Humic substances: from supramolecular aggregation to fractal conformation – Is there time for a new paradigm? // Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13, № 4.
15.    García‐Ruiz J.M., Beguería S., Lana‐Renault N. et al. Ongoing and emerging questions in water erosion studies // Land Degradation & Development. 2017. Vol. 28, № 1.
16.    Márquez C.O., Garcia V.J., Cambardella C.A. et al. Aggregate-Size Stability Distribution and Soil Stability // Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J. 2004. Vol. 68, № 3.
17.    Panova I.G., Demidov V.V., Shulga P.S. et al. Interpolyelectrolyte complexes as effective structure-forming agents for Chernozem // Land Degradation & Development. 2021. Vol. 2, № 2.
18.    Piccolo A., Mbagwu J.S. C. Role of hydrophobic components of soil organic matter in soil aggregate stability // Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J. 1999. Vol. 63, № 6.
19.    Senesi N., Wilkinson K.J. Biophysical chemistry of fractal structures and processes in environmental systems. John Wiley & Sons. 2008.
20.    Tisdall J.M., Oades J.M. Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soils // J. Soil Sci. 1982. № 33.
21.    Totsche K.U., Amelung W., Gerzaber M.H. et al. Microaggregates in soils // J. of Plant Nutr. and Soil Sci. 2018. Vol. 181, № 1.